We\'ll have to agree to disagree. It was a fun movie to look at true enough, but if we celebrate visuals in place of story we due damage to the actual industry. I don\'t doubt its splendor and I do praise its visuals, but a movie that provides only spectacle deserves credit only where its due. It looked like a $300 million dollar movie should look. That\'s really all there is to say. Good movies are supposed to have good visuals that complement a good story. And if one of them is to supersede the other, surely it would be on the story side, and not the graphics?
BTW, I found this on the interwebz and have to share it with you:
Sherlock Holmes [7|10]
I\'m a big fan of the series, yet I am not averse to the changes that they\'ve made. I was worried that they\'d make Holmes too much of an action hero, but its really not as bad as I worried. Indeed his fighting skills only serve to make him that much more of an interesting character. And while the story is out there, I was pleased to see a scientific answer to everything (even if it all seems to be quite a stretch). I was worried at the end end that they were going to just chalk it all up to a supernatural occurrence, which would have been a giant cop out and very much out of nature with the series. One change I didn\'t like though was that they turned Holmes into a slob, and that is extraordinarily unlike him.
Overall I enjoyed the movie a lot, and feel it updates the series well. Its understandable that some people could be upset with the changes, but the changes do make it a more exciting movie.
( Edited 07.01.2010 20:39 by Jacob4000 )