I don't think Hyrule Warriors will get an Ultimate edition, usually only Dynasty Warriors games get those, Samurai Warriors, Pirate Warriors and Gundam Warriors just got sequels.
SirLink said:
a simple roster comparison was always going to look very unfavourable considering how much time other Warriors games had to build upon their roster.
Believe me, I expected under 10 characters from the moment the game was revealed because Pirate Warriors had a small roster and I know that making a game from scratch is harder than adding to already existing assets.
The roster count is far from the problem, there are actually more playable characters than I expected and I didn't expect playable villains.
What rustles my jimmies and grinds my gears and makes me salty is the game favouritism. There's no rule that "oh we had to put in Agitha because Cia said only characters from those 3 games are in the game!" the developers made that rule. They consciously chose to put Agitha in while actively ignoring the rest of the series' rich history.
You can say the game favouritism is understandable, and maybe it is, but that's not going to make fans who are reasonably annoyed about it suddenly happy with a game that would rather include random_NPC_from_overrated_3d_zelda over any single one important unique lovely main character from any single 2D Zelda game.
I'm going to buy and enjoy Hyrule Warriors and probably even recommend it to friends and Zelda fans, but one of its key elements, the fanservice, has a real dampener over it with this frankly unnecessary favouritism. They could have appealed to old and new Zelda fans AND otaku by using a wide variety of characters and places from a wide variety of games. Rather than just FF7 8 and 10.
EDIT: Also Fi I don't mind considering she's like the most iconic Skyward Sword character. Also because I never got the hate for her. I mean at least unlike Agitha she's actually extremely important.
( Edited 05.08.2014 23:28 by SuperLink )