other forums

what other forums does everyone go on mine are

www.square-enix-forums.com
forums.adventchildren.net

http://gamer7.com

http://audioscrobbler.com

..and a few others...

Nintendo HQ - http://www.nintendohq.shorturl.com - really fantastic forum.

Rare Extreme - http://forums.rare-extreme.com - not such a good forum, but its the only place you can discuss Rare games these days without being laughed at.

oh I also go on

forums.kingdomheart2.net

www.thegameswire.com even though we are small these days I love this site and baby sit it for ant.... not litterally, babay sit the site (the webmaster)
The main site is a news portal done with rss feeds, so thats why you will see Cubed3 news links there, neways the forums there are the only others i use

[ Edited by Nanaki on 2004/11/5 20:44 ]

No where really, I spend so much time on here its just not possible.

http://www.alternative-gamer.co.uk/

ditto, www.alternative-gamer.co.uk

yeh www.alternative-gamer.co.uk for me aswell. I'm a member of Gamer 7 aswell but only post there now and then.

Im a member on a couple of hip-hop sites aswell -

sohh.com
hip hop game

http://forums.britxbox.co.uk/

www.xboxaddict.com

www.planetgamecube.com

GamerNETWORK

www.thegameswire.com same resons as nanaki

www.alternative-gamer.co.uk

and

www.stlouisrams.com/ramslife/MBoard

[ Edited by stucorbs on 2004/11/6 12:35 ]

Occasionallly, Gamesmainframe. Usually only when I'm waiting for something on this site, though.

my are:
games helix

gamufi

oo a few AG's coming up. And thats .co.uk stu i wondered y u havnt been on lately . GM, gamerNETWHA?

sometimes I go on hinalove forums

DaOne wrote:
oo a few AG's coming up. And thats .co.uk stu i wondered y u havnt been on lately . GM, gamerNETWHA?

That unprofessional bit of advertising from Clifton is kinda stupid in two ways.

1. We are more successful than AG already, you say you are fully launched, we are not, we are nowhere near. Yet we have more members, more posts, more threads, more everything.

2. That signature is a bit stupid, because people will think 'What's GamerNETWORK?' And they will look, and find out. It's just advertising for us.

People, go to AG, and also go to GN. Compare. If you don't like the skin of GN, sign up, and change it to something you prefer. There are hundreds of threads to reply to in GN. With only a handful, which are dry, in AG.
In the evenings, we have about 6 members online with more guests. They all post regulary, just check the Top 25 User List. That may not be much compared to here, but I mean, look how long this has been going for, and GamerNETWORK isn't even launched yet!!

If it hasn't launched, then why is it online?

Good point, but it's online for people to sign up, get it recognised, and be respected by the time it's launched. I mean, there's more chance of it failing if it just is all worked on behind doors, and then quickly launched, advertising it once it's done that. People will post, like it, tell people and get more people to post and so on, while we work on it, (well, not me anymore, but I won't go into that).

Do you see what I mean?

Or, look at the site, see the lack of contact/polish and never come back again.

GameMaestro wrote:
Good point, but it's online for people to sign up, get it recognised, and be respected by the time it's launched. I mean, there's more chance of it failing if it just is all worked on behind doors, and then quickly launched, advertising it once it's done that. People will post, like it, tell people and get more people to post and so on, while we work on it, (well, not me anymore, but I won't go into that).

Do you see what I mean?

Which is just as good as having launched it... Hell, I can see a review has even been posted up.

The_cackling_idiot wrote:
Or, look at the site, see the lack of contact/polish and never come back again.

Haha... Look, I'm not goign to argue with you, there is no point in it, all I have to say is that GamerNETWORK is nowhere near finished, it will be similar to other sites, like this, but with unique features, which other sites lack. I cannot say these now because a) they are secret to be done with the launch and b) I'm in no position to tell people about it.

1. We are more successful than AG already, you say you are fully launched, we are not, we are nowhere near. Yet we have more members, more posts, more threads, more everything.

hmm lets think about this. Network is about 5 Different sites into one yes? ok so lets take how many memebrs u have (128) and lets just say divide by 3 to make u seem a little better. So thats approximatly 43 members per section. AG has 58 members, so you could say AG is more succesful no?

a) they are secret to be done with the launch and b) I'm in no position to tell people about it.

[ Edited by DaOne on 2004/11/6 16:34 ]