I you haven't done so already go and read the review here.
The main sticking point I had with the game is that its no different to the GBA incarnations. Take away the blow par 3D graphics and the FMV and what do you have left? Should we be happy with a glorified GBA port?
A quick explanation of some of the markdowns for the game.
Lazy sequel: Within three Western releases this game has progressed nowhere, any changes have been cosmetic and good or bad are replaced with different ideas for the next game. FIFA football has demonstrated a greater ability to change and improve yet its only considered a yearly update.
Its for Fire Emblem fans only: Once again FIFA has improved itself to try and draw ProEvo fans into its fold, whether it succeeds or not is irrelevant that fact is that EA are trying. Intelligent Systems have not made any moves to try and make this game accessible for those who were turned away from previous Fire Emblem games. I'm not talking about a Prince of Persia 2 style of change but just including an option to turn off permi-death would make this more than a game for Fire Emblem fans.
This is not a GC game: Batallion Wars and even Zelda: Four Swords has shown us what we can expect of a GBA going to the GC, that the gameplay and not just the graphics can be improved and make use of a home consoles power. Intelligent Systems and Nintendo have decided that porting a game and giving it some upgraded graphics which aren't even of this generation makes it a home console game. If I wanted a game like this I'd happily play it on the GBA or DS but the GC is a different beast, it opens up more options to the developer and that in turn should provide more options for us. When buying a game for the GC I shoudl be overwhelmed in that I couldn't have played this game on a GBA or DS not underwhelmed because I already have.
Rejoice for the Lord will taketh his quarter and give much back to his followers.