Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – Selma (Movie Review)

By Freda Cooper 02.02.2015

Image for Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – Selma (Movie Review)

Selma (UK Rating: 12A)

As Selma opens in the UK this Friday, 6th February, the controversy surrounding its Oscar nominations shows little signs of dying down. Despite the achievements of 12 Years a Slave last year, all the 2015 acting nominees are white, the first time this has happened since 1998. Considered by many as a genuine award prospect, Selma only scored in the Best Picture and Best Original Song categories so, with competition for the top Oscars as fierce as ever, Lights, Camera, Action! checks out what all the fuss has been about.
Image for Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – Selma (Movie Review)

Selma's title probably means more to an American audience than a British one. It's a town in Alabama where, in 1965, a march led by Martin Luther King eventually caused a major change in American law - and a significant step forward for the civil rights movement. Until then, the law said the black population could vote but some Southern states imposed conditions that made it impossible. The first attempt at the march, from Selma to Montgomery, was stopped after a vicious attack on the marchers by the police and state troopers. A second one went off peacefully, with King making a speech at its destination, the governor's building in Montgomery. The governor was segregationist George Wallace.
 
The film's historical accuracy has come into question, but that's not unusual for any film based on real events. On the screen, the audience sees President Johnson (Tom Wilkinson) caving in and granting a new law, not so much because of King's efforts but, ironically, as the result of a meeting with Governor George Wallace (Tim Roth). Wallace wasn't going to change his stance and LBJ (as President Lyndon B. Johnson is oft-referred to as) couldn't let the situation deteriorate any further. Wilkinson, who's become Hollywood's favourite elder Brit, makes a canny LBJ with a mouth that's probably cleaner than the one belonging to the real president - reputedly. Roth, however, delivers a one-note performance as Wallace and is little more than sly.


 
Interestingly, director Ava DuVernay has picked a trio of Brits to play the main roles in the film, completing it with David Oyelowo. It was his omission from the list of Best Actor Oscar nominees that caused the most noise and he is seriously impressive as King, giving his public persona stature and magnetism, but showing us a private side full of insecurities. There's his weakness for other women, which nearly ruins his marriage, and his bouts of self-doubt: at one point he's on the edge of giving up the fight altogether. Should he have made the cut? The Best Actor category is extremely strong this year, with the likes of Michael Keaton, Eddie Redmayne, Steve Carrell, Benedict Cumberbatch and Bradley Cooper all worthy nominees. However, yes, Oyelowo's performance deserves more recognition than it's received so far - no BAFTA nomination either - which can only point to the tightest of tight votes.
 
Du Vernay herself is a bold choice to direct the film, which originally had Lee Daniels at the helm. She brings a certain freshness to its tone, which is always respectful and aware of the story's significance, but never falls into the trap of being over-reverential or sentimental. Her background in documentary film making means she makes bold and effective use of archive footage and the fact that she was born after the events on screen took place means that her commitment is combined with a touch of detachment. The end result is a film with confidence and courage in equal measure.
Image for Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – Selma (Movie Review)

8/10
Rated 8 out of 10

Great - Silver Award

Rated 8 out of 10
Instead of falling into the trap of being a sprawling Martin Luther King biopic, Selma intelligently concentrates on one key moment in King's life and that of the civil rights movement. It pulls no punches in depicting the racism of the time and the audience is left in no doubt about the risks taken by all the campaigners. Then there's a spellbinding moment at the end of the film that reminds everybody that the events shown in the film not only happened, but they happened within living memory. Archive audio footage of the actual marchers singing is played behind the final credits. It's one of those rare occasions when the audience doesn't rush to leave.

Comment on this article

You can comment as a guest or join the Cubed3 community below: Sign Up for Free Account Login

Preview PostPreview Post Your Name:
Validate your comment
  Enter the letters in the image to validate your comment.
Submit Post

Comments

There are no replies to this article yet. Why not be the first?

Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic

If you are a registered member and logged in, you can also subscribe to topics by email.
Sign up today for blogs, games collections, reader reviews and much more
Site Feed
Who's Online?
Azuardo

There are 1 members online at the moment.