Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – The Theory of Everything (Movie Review)

By Freda Cooper 31.12.2014 1

Image for Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – The Theory of Everything (Movie Review)

The Theory of Everything (UK Rating: 12A)

The end of 2014 wasn't exactly packed with great movies, but the start of 2015 looks to be aiming to make up for that. The year kicks off with Birdman and the film that's likely to boost Brit Eddie Redmayne up the acting pecking order, The Theory of Everything, which opens around the UK on Friday, 1st January.

Scientists don't come more famous than Stephen Hawking, so much so that he's not exactly a stranger to the screen. Man of the moment Benedict Cumberbatch played him ten years ago in the TV movie Hawking and the 2013 documentary of the same name took a respectful, but unflinching, look at his life. His latest outing on the big screen, though, takes a different approach.

Image for Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – The Theory of Everything (Movie Review)

The Theory of Everything is a love story, focusing on the relationship between Hawking and his first wife Jane. It moves from their initial meeting and their polar opposite views on religion, through their marriage and three children and their final separation. Between those events come others of equal, if not greater, significance: Hawking's shattering diagnosis of Motor Neurone Disease and the prognosis that he had only two years to live; his PhD and growing status in his field; his deterioration, culminating in the loss of his voice, and its replacement with the electronic one that has become his trademark; and, finally, the best seller that made him a household name.

The romantic element is woven through the very fabric of the film so that Hawking is shown very much through rose-tinted spectacles. He's an inspirational figure, that's true, but here he's also an idealised one: he only has a few moments of sadness and just one of anger. Apart from that, he soldiers on bravely with a twinkle in his eye, and there are moments of comedy as well, especially when he first gets his computerised voice and starts doing Dalek impersonations. The result is a slightly lopsided depiction of the man, but that doesn't take anything away from Eddie Redmayne's performance in the role - it's a genuine star turn.


 
His resemblance to Hawking is remarkable, but this is much more than just an impersonation. His portrayal of his physical decline is beautifully done, with a minimum of make- up and prosthetics, yet he seems to take such a physically and emotionally demanding piece of acting in his stride. This has to be the role that brings him out of the long shadows cast by contemporaries like Cumberbatch and Hardy and projects him into the big league. He can clearly hold his own - and more - against any of the current crop of actors, wherever they come from.

Felicity Jones is equally impressive as his wife Jane, a taxing role but in a completely different way. She is as determined as her husband, fiercely loyal and intensely loving, yet to the outside world she can appear cool and formal. Everything is going on underneath the surface and she's especially convincing when the stress of her husband's condition brings her to the brink.

Image for Feature | Lights, Camera, Action! – The Theory of Everything (Movie Review)

The story is told in a straightforward manner, with the minimum of flashbacks and only a smattering of astrophysics for the science nerds in the audience. There are, however, moments of real imagination. The moment when Hawking gets inspiration for one of his theories works perfectly, for instance. He's struggling to put on a jumper, gets stuck halfway, and finds himself looking through the garment at the living room fire; it's a little stroke of genius.

8/10
Rated 8 out of 10

Great - Silver Award

Rated 8 out of 10
The romantic, idealised tone of The Theory of Everything makes the audience wonder what they are not being told about Hawking's early years and marriage - there has to be more to it than what's on the screen. That said, it is a very well made piece of cinema that is full of warmth, compassion and intelligence, but, ultimately, there are two real reasons for seeing it: they are called Redmayne and Jones.

Comment on this article

You can comment as a guest or join the Cubed3 community below: Sign Up for Free Account Login

Preview PostPreview Post Your Name:
Validate your comment
  Enter the letters in the image to validate your comment.
Submit Post

Comments

Oh no. No, no, no. We clash on opinions again, Freda Smilie Sorry Smilie

I thought this was terrible - an empty puff-piece that dragged, making the two hours seem far longer.

Sure, can't knock the portrayal of Hawking - kudos to Eddie Redmayne for getting it spot on, but the movie itself was just so void of anything interesting. I felt no emotional attachment between the two lead characters, there was not enough focus on Hawking's actual achievements and how he realised many of his ideas, and so on.

Sadly, it was as I'd initially expected after seeing the first trailer before Christmas - an extremely bland romance tale that could have been done with ANY other characters and had pretty much the same effect.

Birdman, Imitation Game, Big Hero 6 - all fantastic and well worth watching. This, on the other hand, was painful to sit through.

Adam Riley [ Director :: Cubed3 ]

UNITE714: Weekly Prayers | Bible Verses

Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic

If you are a registered member and logged in, you can also subscribe to topics by email.
Sign up today for blogs, games collections, reader reviews and much more
Site Feed
Who's Online?
Chris125

There are 1 members online at the moment.